Legal Opinion
Holcomb v. Lorino
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1935No. 6782. Motion No. 11,650PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp
After a careful consideration of the motion for rehearing filed herein by counsel for defendant in error, we have decided to substitute the following opinion for the original opinion rendered in this case. 76 S. W. (2d) 509.
On the 2d das'- of November, 1933, Bernard Lorino filed in the District Court for the Eightieth Judicial District of Harris County his original petition for a temporary injunction against the Mayor and Commissioners of the City of Houston from interfering with his possession of Stall No. 14, or in any manner interfering with his trade, or from compelling him to move or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- House v. ReavisTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Juneman v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Hartzog v. Seeger Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Hill v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Gibson v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1858
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Coinmach Corp. F/K/A Solon Automated Services, Inc. v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
- Scott Et Ux. v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Brown v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Lorino v. Crawford Packing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- McGlothlin v. KliebertTexas Supreme Court · 1984
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.