Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Herbert

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1988No. C-4986PublishedCited by 417 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILGARLIN, Justice.

Once more we confront the tension between the constitutionally guaranteed right of trial by jury and the constitutionally bestowed grant to courts of appeals that their decisions shall be conclusive on questions of fact. Dorothy Herbert sued her former husband, Hansel Kay Herbert, to collect one-half of his military retirement benefits pursuant to a property settlement agreement contained in their divorce decree. Hansel answered that Dorothy was not entitled to specific performance because she had materially breached the agreement by refusing to turn over to him certain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by417 opinions

  1. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Rose v. Doctors HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1990

412 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API