Legal Opinion

State v. Cannon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1923No. 18016PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellants were informed against, tried and convicted of the violation of § 7243, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. § 3134], being a part of the insurance code. The section in question refers only to those engaged in writing life, health and accident insurance, and reads as follows:

“It shall be unlawful for any company or agent thereof to hypothecate, sell, or dispose of a promissory note, received in payment for any part of a premium on a policy of insurance applied for under the provisions of this article, prior to the delivery of the policy to the applicant."

Appealing from judgments imposing fines…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bacich v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Northern Cedar Co. v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Kelleher v. MinshullWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Casco Co. v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API