Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of S.A.V.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1986No. C2-85-2240PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

S.A.V. and S.M.V. were adjudicated dependent children pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.015, subd. 6(d) (1984). The parents appeal, challenging the adjudication of dependency and the dispositional order. We affirm.

FACTS

S.A.V. and S.M.V. are the twin daughters of B.V. (father) and L.V. (mother). The twins were born in July 1985 and were approximately eleven weeks old at the time of the relevant events.

On October 2, 1985, S.M.V. was taken to the local hospital in Marshall, Minnesota by her parents. Dr. Jewett, the physician who examined her, suspected that S.M.V. was suffering…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Daniel D.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. P.Z.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. In Re the Welfare of J.W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. In Re Daniel D.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API