Legal Opinion

Department of Social & Health Services v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 11, 2005No. 54019-0-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*790¶1 The parents of J.R.U.-S. (J.U.) are the subjects of both a criminal investigation and dependency proceedings involving J.U. The principal issue before us is whether the courts in the dependency proceedings abused their discretion when they allowed the parents’ counsel to attend court ordered psychological evaluations.

Agid, J.

¶2 We conclude that while the parents had no constitutional or statutory right to counsel during their evaluations, the courts did not abuse their discretion because the parents’ Fifth Amendment rights were implicated, and the immunity statute provides inadequate…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of KistenmacherWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re the Detention of KistenmacherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. In re Dependency of A.M.-S.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
  4. In re the Dependency of D.C.-M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. In Re Dependency Of : A.m-s., Dob: 12/17/08, Sergio Michel-garcia, Pet v. State Of Wa, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API