Legal Opinion
Pesino v. Atlantic Bank of New York
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 17, 1998No. SC 15743PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This appeal involves the interpretation of the term “back end payments” as used in a settlement agreement between the plaintiff investor class2 and the defendant, Atlantic Bank of New York. The defendant *89is the successor in interest to the payee of certain promissory notes signed by the plaintiff to finance their investments in Colonial Constitution Limited Partnership (Colonial Constitution). Colonial Constitution was a limited partnership formed in 1989, in which Colonial Realty Company (Colonial Realty) was a general partner.3 After Colonial Realty collapsed and Colonial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re Samantha C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- O & G Industries, Inc. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.