Legal Opinion

Thiel v. Allstate Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1986No. 85-1162PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether R.C. 4123.741, which creates fellow-employee immunity against liability, prevents an insured from recovering damages under the uninsured motorist provisions of his insurance policy. For the reasons set forth below, we answer this inquiry in the negative.

This court is called upon to interpret the meaning of the phrase “legally entitled to recover” as used in R.C. 3937.18(A)(1)1 and in the automobile insurance policy at issue in this case.2 Appellant maintains that pursuant *110to R.C. 4123.741 and Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, as construed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pryor v. WebberOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. York v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Kaiser v. StrallOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Medders v. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Motorists Mutual Insurance Companies v. HandlovicOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. AntonelliOhio Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API