Legal Opinion

Motorists Mutual Insurance Companies v. Handlovic

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1986No. 85-185PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

In Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Shuff (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 172 [21 O.O.3d 108], this court held in the syllabus:

“An insured who seeks to recover damages from his insurer under an uninsured motorist policy and is unsuccessful after a trial on the merits and a jury verdict, may not thereafter submit to arbitration the issue of the liability of the uninsured motorist. (R.C. 3937.18, applied.)”

Appellants contend that Shuff can be distinguished from the instant case because Motorists, unlike the insurance company in Shuff, was not named as a party in the insureds’ action against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. ShuffOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Thiel v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Fisher v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fisher v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Griffith v. LintonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API