Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1950No. 7347PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Chief Justice.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff to recover for injuries allegedly sustained by him as the result of drinking a bottle of contaminated Coca Cola. From a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiff is employed by the American Smelting & Refining Company, at Garfield, Utah. On October 5, 1948, he purchased a bottle of Coca Cola from a vending machine on the premises of his employer. The injury complained of consisted of his becoming sick and nauseated and remaining sick intermitently for three days, and suffering from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. SullivanTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Angerman Co., Inc. v. Edgemon Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. White v. PinneyUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Campbell Soup Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  5. Jenkins v. Bogalusa Coca Cola Bottling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  2. Asher v. Coca Cola Bottling CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Rafferty v. Northern Utilities Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pulley v. Pacific Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Keller v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API