Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. Sullivan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1942PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is another of those numerous cases in which recovery is sought against a Bottling Company, for injury alleged to have been suffered by a drinker of a bottle of Coca-Cola, which, contained harmful foreign matter. In some of the reported cases this was an insect, in others a mouse, again a cigar stub, or, as in, the instant case, a bit of glass. The courts have been called on to decide questions of fact — whether (1) plaintiff found the matter in the bottle, as alleged; (2) if injury was suffered from this cause and its extent; (3) whether the foreign matter was put, or left, in the bottle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Brown v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Boyd v. Coca Cola Bottling WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Peters v. Lynchburg Light & Traction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ford Motor v. WagonerTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Cockrum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Olney v. Beaman Bottling CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Armes Ex Rel. Armes v. HulettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API