Legal Opinion

Pulley v. Pacific Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1966No. 37816PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

Foreign matter occasionally found, or allegedly found, in bottles of Coca-Cola is a perpetual provoker of legal controversy. The nature of the foreign or deleterious material allegedly ingested by consumers has ranged from the expectable to the totally unpredictable. Thus, despite the investment of large sums of money, manpower, and scientific expertise, the manufacturers of this carbonated beverage apparently have as yet been unable to develop a bottling or manufacturing process which is infallible in terms of the purity and wholesomeness of the manufactured product. Lawsuits by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gerberg v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. LaHue v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Simmons v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Connell v. Norton Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Kiessling v. Northwest Greyhound Lines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Dixon v. Fiat-Roosevelt Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Getchell v. Auto Bar Systems Northwest, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Jarstad v. Tacoma Outdoor Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API