Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 12, 1997No. 3:95cv1216(AHN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT SCOTT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
NEVAS, District Judge.
By Memorandum of Decision and Order dated April 2, 1997, the court concluded that the defendant, Stanley G. Scott (“Scott”), violated the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, 18 U.S.C. § 248 (“FACE”), on several occasions. The court also issued an injunction against Scott which limited his conduct with respect to the Summit Women’s Center (“Summit”), in Bridgeport, Connecticut. See United States v. Scott, 958 F.Supp. 761, 784 (D.Conn.1997).
Now pending before the court are Scott’s Motions for Reconsideration…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Application for Issuance of Order Requiring the United States Environmental Protection Agency to Produce Dr. Thomas Spittler to Testify by Videotape Deposition. Appeal of Sun Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Ciro GarganoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Stanley G. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999