Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanley G. Scott

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 4, 1999No. 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

187 F.3d 282 (2nd Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF CONNECTICUT, as parens patriae, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees,

v.

STANLEY G. SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant,

CARMEN E.F. VAZQUEZ, Defendant-Counter-Claimant,

BOBBY J. RILEY, Defendant,

CONNECTICUT WOMEN'S EDUCATION AND LEGAL FUND, Amicus Curiae,

SUMMIT WOMEN'S CENTER, Movant,

HARTFORD COURANT COMPANY, INC. and MARK PAZNIOKAS, Interested Parties.

Docket No. 98-6087

August Term, 1998

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND CIRCUIT

Argued Feb. 22, 1999

Decided Aug. 4, 1999

Appeal from order of the United States District Court for the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API