Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 2, 1997No. 3:95cv1216 (AHN)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
NEVAS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs United States of America and State of Connecticut bring this action against defendants Stanley G. Scott (“Scott”), Carmen E.F. Vazquez (‘“Vazquez”), and Bobby J. Riley (“Riley”), alleging violations of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (“FACE”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 248(a) — 248(e). The plaintiffs’ claim that the defendants have in the past, and will likely again in the future, violate FACE by interfering with access to the Summit Women’s Center (“Summit”) in Bridgeport, Connecticut, a health clinic that provides reproductive health…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- United States of America and State of Connecticut, as Parens Patriae v. Carmen E.F. Vazquez, Stanley G. Scott and Bobby J. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- New York ex rel. Spitzer v. Operation Rescue NationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- PEOPLE OF STATE OF NY EX REL. SPITZER v. KraegerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.