Legal Opinion

Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NY

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 19, 1997No. 95-1065PublishedCited by 331 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

The question presented is whether an injunction that places restrictions on demonstrations outside abortion clinics violates the First Amendment. We uphold the provisions imposing “fixed bubble” or “fixed buffer zone” limitations, as hereinafter described, but hold that the provisions imposing “floating bubble” or “floating buffer zone” limitations violate the First Amendment.

I

Respondents include three doctors and four medical clinics (two of which are part of larger hospital complexes) in and around Rochester and Buffalo in upstate New York. These health care providers perform abortions and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by331 opinions

  1. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. McTernan v. City of York, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

326 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API