Legal Opinion

State v. Monk

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 19, 2005No. AC 25041PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

This appeal arises from the judgments of conviction, following the guilty pleas by the defendant, Dajshon Monk, under the Alford doctrine,1 to one count of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 and two counts of burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103. The defendant claims that the trial court violated his due process right to a fair trial because (1) he did not knowingly and voluntarily plead guilty, and (2) the court accepted his pleas without ordering, on its own motion, an evidentiary hearing concerning his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. StithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. State v. PaulinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Irizarry v. IrizarryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. State v. AlvaradoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. State v. YeawConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API