Legal Opinion

Irizarry v. Irizarry

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 19, 2005No. AC 25364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

This appeal arises from a postdissolution judgment order rendered by the trial court. On appeal, the plaintiff, Joseph Irizarry, claims that (1) § 46b-215a-2a (e) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies violates article first, § 20, of the constitution of Connecticut and (2) the court’s finding of child care costs was not supported by the evidence. We agree with the plaintiff with regard to his second claim and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to the review of the plaintiffs appeal. The plaintiff and the defendant,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. DuntzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Tevolini v. TevoliniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Prial v. PrialConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bruno v. GellerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Dickinson v. MullaneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Dionne v. DionneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Brusby v. Metropolitan DistrictConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API