State v. Paulino
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The defendant, Jose Paulino, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b) and possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a public school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion by failing, sua sponte, during the trial, to order a competency hearing. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BuieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. DortConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. HinesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. Jeremy D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. TriceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.