Legal Opinion
State v. Stith
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 27, 2008No. AC 27731PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Talance J. Stith, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court after he entered a guilty plea under the Alford doctrine 1 to threatening in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw the guilty plea. Specifically, the defendant claims that the plea was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made because (1) he was under the influence of medication at the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. SuttonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HansonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Almedina v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Toles v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Mock v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Ramos v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.