Legal Opinion
Davie v. Wingard
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 6, 1997No. Civil Action C-2-95-513PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Douglas Davie, an inmate incarcerated by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, brings this action alleging that defendants have enforced the Department’s grooming policy contrary to his religious beliefs, discriminated against him on the basis of his gender, and caused him mental anguish and violated other constitutional rights. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel’s January 16, 1997 Report and Recommendation that defendants’ May 31, 1996 motion for summary judgment be granted.
No objections to the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Madison v. RiterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2003
- Ajaj v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- Hoevenaar v. LazaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003