Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Silverstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 4, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

These are two actions of tort, one against the owner, and the other against the operator, of an auto*525mobile, to recover for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate by reason of being struck by the automobile, which was allegedly operated in a negligent manner. The only question argued is whether there was error in the direction of verdicts for the defendants.

We summarize the facts which the jury could have found upon the evidence, which came entirely from witnesses called by the plaintiff. The only eyewitness to the actual striking of the deceased was the defendant Sherman (hereinafter called…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whalen v. MutrieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Rizzittelli v. VestineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Conrad v. MazmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Snow v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Walsh v. GillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Horowitz v. BokronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Mitchell v. SilversteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Pardo v. General Hospital Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Woods v. DeMontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Cleary v. St. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API