Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Mazman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 28, 1934PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is an action of tort. The declaration is in two counts, one for the death and the other for the conscious suffering of the plaintiff’s intestate, who was run down by the *232defendant’s motor truck while crossing a street in Cambridge. The defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied and there was a verdict for the plaintiff on both counts. The case comes before us on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict, to the refusal of the judge to instruct the jury as requested and to certain portions of the charge, and on the plaintiff’s exceptions to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Berdos v. Tremont & Suffolk MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- London v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PolianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Kelly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Lydon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Shore v. Retailers Commercial Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.