Sussman v. San Luis Obispo County
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order refusing a new trial. V. A. Gregg, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
—Plaintiff brings this action against the defendants to quiet his title to a certain wagon-road and bridge resting thereon. Defendants, county of San Luis Obispo and hoard of supervisors of said county, in their answer deny the material allegations in the complaint, and set up as a defense the dedication by the plaintiff and his predecessors in interest of said road and bridge to the public as a public road, thoroughfare, and highway, and also plead the statute of limitations. The supervisors, as individuals, disclaim any interest in said property. Upon the issues thus raised, the court found…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Helm v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Abbott v. '76 Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. Eel River & Eureka RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Venice v. Short Line Beach Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Maxon-Nowlin Co. v. NorswingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. Marblehead Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- United States v. RindgeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1913
- Cherokee Valley Farms, Inc. v. Summerville Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.