Hughes v. Recorder's Court
Michigan Supreme Court
Application for writ of prohibition to restrain proceedings against relator under section 11 of chapter 66 of the ordinances of the city of Detroit, as amended. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Relator asks a final writ of prohibition to restrain proceedings against him under what he claims to be aH illegal ordinance. An order to show cause was made, and the return shows these facts:
Prior to April 15, 1889, by chapter 66 of the city ordinances of Detroit, relating to public markets, the public markets of the city of Detroit were by section 1 defined as including the Cass market, which is a small triangle between *575Adams, Cass, and Grand River avenues, and the Central market, which includes a space 50 feet wide, extending fr.om the Campus Martius to Randolph street, crossed by Bates…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Henkel v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Taggart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crittenden v. Town of BoonevilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
- Loftus v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Carrigan v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. KeirMichigan Supreme Court · 1889