Taggart v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Information-in tbe nature of a bill in equity to restrain tbe city of Detroit from discontinuing tbe Central public market in that city. Complainant appeals. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
The Attorney General filed his information in the nature of a bill in equity to restrain the city of Detroit from discontinuing the Central public market in that city. The court below, upon an answer not controverting anything material in the information, dismissed the bill, but we are not informed whether this was done for a supposed lack of authority in the Attorney General, or for want of equity. Both of those questions were argued. The Attorney General appeals.
There can be no doubt of the right and duty of the Attorney General to intervene and prevent franchises of a public nature from…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cooper v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by10 opinions
- Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. Wonderland Shopping Ctr., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
- In re BusheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Petz v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Parker v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Hughes v. Recorder's CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.