Legal Opinion
People v. Keir
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Certiorari to recorder’s court of Detroit. (Chambers, J.) Respondent was convicted of selling produce on the streets of the city of Detroit contrary to an ordinance of said city. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The defendant was prosecuted and convicted in the recorder’s court under the following ordinance of the city of Detroit, and. adjudged to pay a fine of two dollars:
“An ordinance to amend section 11 of chapter 66 of *100the Revised Ordinances of 1884, as amended April 5, 1889.
“It is hereby ordained by the people of the city of Detroit:
“Section 1. That section 11 of chapter 66 of the Revised Ordinances of 1884, as amended April 5, 1889, be, and the same is hereby, amended so as to read as follows:
“c Sec. 11. All farmers and gardeners selling, or offering for sale, from wagons, carts, or other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stevenson v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Taggart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Hughes v. Recorder's CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Chicazgo v. RhineIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Vernakes v. City of South HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Kochin v. Superior Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914