Henkel v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeals from the Superior Court of Detroit. Injunction bill. Both parties appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The object of the bill in this case is to obtain a perpetual injunction against the use by the city of Detroit of Michigan Grand avenue for market purposes to the prejudice of complainant.
Michigan Grand avenue extends from Campus Martius to Randolph street, and is two hundred ;feet in width. Fifty feet in width through the middle, from end to end, was duly taken and condemned by the city for market purposes several years ago, and is now occupied as a public market, with buildings and sheds. This appropriation left seventy-five feet in width for a public street on each side. Bates street…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Fisher v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Gale v. Village of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- City of Detroit v. BeckmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Wilhoit v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.