Grievance Administrator v. Rostash
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the Attorney Discipline Board that affirmed a ninety-day suspension of respondent James J. Rostash’s license to practice law. On behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, the Grievance Administrator argues that the imposed discipline is insufficient for the misconduct that was proven. We agree, and increase the term of suspension to 180 days.
i
In July 1993, the Attorney Grievance Commission authorized the filing of a three-count formal complaint against the respondent. The complaint stemmed from his involvement with William D. Frey, then Monroe County…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In the Matter of GrimesMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. PoslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- In the Matter of TromblyMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000