Legal Opinion

State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Posler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1974No. 14 October Term 1974, Docket No. 55,411PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. S. Coleman, J.

Respondent appeals an order of the State Bar Grievance Board suspending him from the practice of law for a period of 90 days. The State Bar Grievance Administrator claims a cross-appeal from the order because it reduced the six months suspension imposed by the hearing panel. We affirm the order of the board.

The hearing panel found that respondent had conducted himself in an unprofessional manner by his handling of certain probate matters. There is sufficient testimony and factual support on the record to support these findings. See State Bar Grievance Administrator v Estes, 392 Mich 645; 221…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. PoslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. AlbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State Bar of Michigan v. BlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of GrimesMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In the Matter of FreedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In the Matter of TromblyMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Grievance Administrator v. NickelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bonner v. Disciplinary Bd. of Ala. State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API