Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Fifer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1916No. 13455Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Rice, J., entered February 2, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to foreclose liens, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, Vaughan and forty-one others, commenced this action in the superior court for Lewis county seeking foreclosure of liens claimed by them upon certain lumber which by their labor they assisted in manufacturing *554while employed by the Baker-May Lumber Company, at its mill at Mays, in Lewis county. The defendant Fifer, doing business as L. R. Fifer Lumber Company, was made a party to the action because of his claim of title to the lumber sought to be foreclosed upon, and because of his claim that the lumber was removed from the mill where manufactured before filing of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akers v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Proulx v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Grimm v. Pacific Creosoting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Judge v. Bay Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Swartwood v. Red Star Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API