Legal Opinion

Proulx v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1893No. 601PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

The respondents instituted a joint action against one James Y. Taylor to recover the amounts al*479leged to be severally due them for labor in securing saw logs, and to foreclose loggers’ liens on a certain boom of logs, consisting of about 388,000 feet in quantity, which were alleged to be in the possession of the Stetson & Post Mill Company as the vendee of Taylor. Baker intervened in the action, by leave of the court, and joined with the defendant mill company in resisting the foreclosure of plaintiffs’ liens. Taylor did not appear in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dexter Horton & Co. v. SparkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Martin v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Cowie v. AhrenstedtWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Appleman v. MyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Alford v. Metcalf Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brazier Forest Products, Inc. v. Northern Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Carpenter v. McCord Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Peters v. McPhersonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Steel v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Steele v. HellarWashington Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API