Legal Opinion
MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. CELLINO
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 10, 2015No. 111,760PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
T1 We need to address only one issue in this Workers' Compensation matter and that *294is whether the claimant's request for class certification is a "claim for compensation1 and subject to the five-year statute of limitations found in 85 0.98.Supp.1995, 43(B) We hold that the request is a claim for compensation and that the claimant failed to diligently prosecute this claim, which is now barred by the five-year limitation found in 43(B).
T2 The claimant, Anthony Cellino, was injured on the job on April 4, 1995, with re-injury on December 17, 1995. His claims were consolidated for purposes of his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Beatty v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Hendricks Ex Rel. Hendricks v. Methvin Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. CELLINOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. CELLINOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015