Legal Opinion

Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 2006No. 100,295, 100,371PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINCHESTER, V.C.J.

{1 There are three issues in this class action from Workers' Compensation Court: whether the court erred by refusing to certify the petitioners' awards to the district court pursuant to 85 0.8.2001, § 42, whether the special treatment of the Multiple Injury Trust Fund in § 42 is constitutional and whether the trial court may redetermine who may opt out of the class.

I. FACTS

1 2 This case has a long history, with three previously published opinions from the Court of Civil Appeals: Dean v. Special Indemnity Fund, 1998 OK CIV APP 30, 956 P.2d 945; Multiple Injury Trust Fund v.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Head v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Harmon v. CradduckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Hanson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API