Eric Boston v. Kitsap County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENGLAND, District Judge:
Appellants Kitsap County (“Kitsap”) and Conmed, Inc. (“Conmed”) (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss as time barred Appellee Eric Boston’s (“Ap-pellee” or “Plaintiff’) claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Appellee contends that the applicable statute of limitations was tolled under RCW 4.96.020. We hold, however, that because RCW 4.96.020 is a special statute of limitations as opposed to a typical tolling provision, it is not applicable to'claims filed under § 1983. As a result, we find that Appellee…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Rita Camacho, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Bridgeport Financial Inc., and Ray Lewis, Christina HarbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Rex Milton Rose v. Joseph C. RinaldiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- A.T. v. Everett Sch. Dist.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Fager v. Olympic Peninsula Narcotics Enforcement TeamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- A H v. Shane HellyerDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Anthony William Fielder, Jr. v. Clark County, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Beeman v. City of Sedro WoolleyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.