Legal Opinion
A H v. Shane Hellyer
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided May 1, 2020No. 4:20-cv-05042Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 A.H., NO. 4:20-CV-5042-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 SHANE HELLYER, in his individual capacity, and CITY OF PROSSER, a 11 Municipal Corporation in the State of Washington, 12 Defendants. 13 14 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15 2). This matter was submitted for consideration without oral argument. The Court 16 has reviewed the record and files herein, and is fully informed. For the reasons 17 discussed below, Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 2) is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Angel Soto v. Unknown SweetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Hughes Anderson Bagley, Jr. v. Cmc Real Estate Corporation, AKA Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Donald E. Mitchell Norman W. PrinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.