Fager v. Olympic Peninsula Narcotics Enforcement Team
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiffs-Appellants Steven Fager, Timothy Fager, Cynthia Fager, Kathleen Wheller, Gary Corman, and Ted DeBray appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their remaining state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review dé novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). Odom v. Microsoft Corp., 486 F.3d 541, 545 (9th Cir. 2007). We also review de novo whether a claim is barred by the statute of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donald Berg Et Ano v. City Of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Tojek v. Whatcom CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021