Legal Opinion

Fager v. Olympic Peninsula Narcotics Enforcement Team

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2017No. 15-35133UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiffs-Appellants Steven Fager, Timothy Fager, Cynthia Fager, Kathleen Wheller, Gary Corman, and Ted DeBray appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their remaining state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review dé novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). Odom v. Microsoft Corp., 486 F.3d 541, 545 (9th Cir. 2007). We also review de novo whether a claim is barred by the statute of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donald Berg Et Ano v. City Of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  2. Tojek v. Whatcom CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API