Burns Bros. v. Carfloats the B. & O. No. 177 & the B. & O. No. 179
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
The libellant has moved for an order directing the respondent-claimant to produce “for examination before trial” the tug dispatchers of the respondent-claimant who were on duty on behalf of the respondent-claimant on or about November 24 and 25, 1950 and, in default thereof, for an order “striking the defendant’s answer”. Neither the notice of motion nor the supporting affidavit suggests under what rule or under what section of the United States Code the motion is made.
Annexed to the moving affidavit is a photostatic copy of a letter written by the proctors for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Park & Tilford Distillers Corp. v. Distillers Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Curry v. States Marine Corp. of DelawareDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Reid v. C. H. Cronin, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Armsey v. Medshares Management Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
- Goldman v. ShahmoonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
- Intercontinental Fibres, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Rapoca Energy Co. v. AMCI Export Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- Goldman v. ShahmoonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965