Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Shahmoon
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided March 17, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Marvel, Vice Chancellor:
Plaintiff has notified counsel for the appearing defendants that she intends to take the depositions of the corporate defendant Shahmoon Industries, Incorporated “* * * by Harry Cohen, its Comptroller, and Harry Cohen, individually * * *” and also “* * * by Harry Iny, a managing agent, and employee, and Harry Iny, individually * * The defendant Shahmoon Industries, Incorporated, has moved to vacate such notice on the grounds that Harry Cohen and Harry Iny are not officers, directors nor man*228aging agents of the corporate defendant and are accordingly not subject to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vardeman v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Rubin v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Colonial Capital Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- Fay v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- NMI Systems, Inc. v. Pillard (In Re NMI Systems, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Goldman v. ShahmoonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965