Reid v. C. H. Cronin, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
SUGARMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff in a suit for injuries allegedly sustained by him because of the negligence of two corporate defendants, served a notice to take the deposition of one of the defendants upon oral examination of its president. The defendant’s president, according to the moving affidavit, “was duly served with a subpoena duces tecum directing that he appear at the time of said examination and produce” certain documents and records. By counsel’s stipulation, a person other than defendant’s president appeared and was examined.
Objection was made by defendant’s counsel to…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Fay v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Burns Bros. v. Carfloats the B. & O. No. 177 & the B. & O. No. 179District Court, E.D. New York · 1957
- Ross v. Cities Service Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957