State ex rel. Cleveland Wrecking Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relator first contends that the Industrial Commission abused its discretion in accepting the claimant’s VSSR application as it was filed more than two years after the alleged time of the accident. Relator points out that the VSSR application was filed on June 11,1982, at 2:12 p.m. The accident giving rise to this action is said to have occurred on June 11, 1980 before 2:12 p.m.
This proposition is without basis. Fractions of a day are not generally considered in the legal computation of time, and the day on which an act is done or an event occurs must be wholly included or excluded. Arrowsmith…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Royer v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- State ex rel. Harris v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Greulich v. MonninOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. A-F Industries v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Bevis v. CoffinberryOhio Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chijide v. Maniilaq Ass'n of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Volker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Ohio Mushroom Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Hartco, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Volker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.