Greulich v. Monnin
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The insurance company raises numerous questions, the first of which is procedural and arises by reason of the fact that in her first step against the company the plaintiff made the mistake of instituting a new and separate action, as formerly permitted, instead of filing simply a supplemental petition in the - original case, as provided by Section 9510-4, General Code, in its amended form.
This statute itself fixes no limitation of time within which such a supplemental petition may be filed, but the policy here involved provides that “no * * * action * * * shall be maintained * * * against the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Stroehmann v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Matter of Garelick v. RosenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by32 opinions
- White v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Joint Council Dining Car Employees Local 370 v. Delaware, L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Wilt v. SmackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- United States Steel Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Abele v. A. L. Dougherty Overseas, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1961
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.