Legal Opinion

State ex rel. A-F Industries v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1986No. 85-1664PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

The VSSR award in this cause was granted upon the Industrial Commission’s finding that appellant violated IC-5-03.07(A), which provided in pertinent part:

“(A) DISENGAGING FROM POWER SUPPLY.
“Means shall be provided at each machine, within easy reach of the operator, for disengaging it from its power supply. * * *”

The dispositive question we must determine is whether there was reliable, probative and substantial evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s finding that the violation of the specific safety requirement resulted in the injury in question.

Our review of the abundant precedent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State ex rel. Harris v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Thompson v. Fenix & Scisson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Watson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Scott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Cleveland Wrecking Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Ohio Mushroom Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API