State ex rel. Hartco, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Relator contends that Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-5-11(D)(10)(b) exempts it from the requirements of Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-5-11(D)(10)(a). In the alternative, it argues that if the *182(D)(10)(b) exception is found inapplicable, the commission nonetheless abused its discretion under (D)(10)(a) in equating the term “means” with the term “guard.” Moreover, it contends that, contrary to the commission’s determination, it did provide a “means” of protection under (D)(10) (a). Relator’s contentions are without merit.

Ohio Adm. Code 4121:l-5-ll(D) (10) provides that:

“Nip points.

“(a) Means shall be provided to…