Legal Opinion
Rand v. Board of Psychology
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 2012No. C064475PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MAURO, J.
Psychologist Randy Rand filed a petition for writ of administrative mandamus challenging the authority of the Board of Psychology (Board) to discipline him for unprofessional conduct, gross negligence, violation of laws governing the practice of psychology, and dishonesty. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 2960, subds. (i), (j), (k), (n).)1 The trial court entered judgment denying his writ petition.
Rand contends on appeal that (1) the Board lacked jurisdiction to discipline him for his conduct as a special master because (a) he was acting in a judicial capacity and (b) he was not acting…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Doe v. Univ. of S. Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Yuba City Unified Sch. Dist. v. Cal. State Teachers' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- In the Matter of R. Eric Bloomfield, DVMSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Adams v. Jack A.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fettgather v. Bd. of Psychology, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.