Legal Opinion

Adams v. Jack A.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 2012No. G045920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Jack A. (father) appeals a postjudgment order awarding sole legal custody to Christina Adams (mother) of the parents’ only child, J. (now 14 years old). Because the court erred by refusing to remove an Evidence Code section 730 evaluator for bias and then relying on the evaluator’s biased report in awarding mother sole legal custody of J., we reverse the custody modification order.1 We also hold the court erred by denying father’s motion for the appointment of a special master and father’s request for a determination of the reasonableness of the section 730 evaluator’s fees.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Mercury Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Rand v. Board of PsychologyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winternitz v. Winternitz CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Benner v. Tam (In re Benner), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Marriage of BennerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API