Legal Opinion

In the Matter of R. Eric Bloomfield, DVM

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 11, 2014No. 2013-0192PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.

The respondent, R. Eric Bloomfield, DVM, appeals a decision of the New Hampshire Board of Veterinary Medicine (Board) in which it reprimanded the respondent based upon its findings that he failed to do a physical examination of a puppy prior to demonstrating a restraint technique, that his restraint of the puppy was excessive, and that he failed to respect the opinion of the puppy’s owners. We affirm.

The Board found or the record establishes the following pertinent facts. On August 6,2007, a couple took their male five-month old Shih Tzu puppy, Toby, and two other puppies to see the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. McClellan v. Board of Regents of the State UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Chastek v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CollinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  2. Appeal of Sandra Brown, DVMSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  3. Appeal of Nicole CollinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  4. Ron L. Beaulieu & Company v. New Hampshire Board of AccountancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API