Legal Opinion

In Re Thorpe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1936No. 26245PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The defendant was convicted of the commission of a felony. Let us, therefore, first examine the statutory provisions specifically governing and controlling the execution of sentence for a felony. It is quite apparent that, upon conviction of the defendant, action subsequent thereto was in accordance with the provisions of Section 13455-1, General Code, which reads as follows:

“A person sentenced for felony to the penitentiary or a -reformatory, unless the execution thereof is suspended, shall be conveyed to the penitentiary or such reformatory, by the sheriff of the county in which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Halsey v. LloydOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Coleman v. McGettrickOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Lessin v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API