Legal Opinion

Lessin v. McFaul

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1992No. 90-2549PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the court of appeals’ decision conflicts with our decision in Dapice v. Stickrath (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 298, 533 N.E.2d 339. We agree and reverse the decision of the court of appeals. In Dapice, we stated that habeas corpus would no longer be available to grant bail on appeal because there is no constitutional right to bail pending appeal, *418and, therefore, requests for the writ are subject to R.C. 2725.05, which states that the writ will not be allowed when a prisoner is restrained by an order of a court with jurisdiction to make the order. Dapice also stated that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Halsey v. LloydOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Dapice v. StickrathOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re ThorpeOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brown v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In re Tyler v. SchillingOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API