State v. Soria
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
*102OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant John David Soria (“Defendant”) challenges the imposition of a $45 warrant fee assessment as part of his sentence. He contends that the superior court’s administrative order requiring imposition of the fee whenever a bench warrant is issued is inapplicable because he was not arrested under a bench warrant but an arrest warrant. We agree, and modify the sentence by vacating the warrant fee.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On September 23, 2005, a complaint was filed charging Defendant with two counts of aggravated driving under the influence (“DUI”). A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. MunningerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Medley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. McDonaghCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. James A. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State of Arizona v. James LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.