Legal Opinion

State v. Soria

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 27, 2007No. 1 CA-CR 06-1045PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*102OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant John David Soria (“Defendant”) challenges the imposition of a $45 warrant fee assessment as part of his sentence. He contends that the superior court’s administrative order requiring imposition of the fee whenever a bench warrant is issued is inapplicable because he was not arrested under a bench warrant but an arrest warrant. We agree, and modify the sentence by vacating the warrant fee.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On September 23, 2005, a complaint was filed charging Defendant with two counts of aggravated driving under the influence (“DUI”). A…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. MunningerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Medley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State v. LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. State v. McDonaghCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. State of Arizona v. James A. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State of Arizona v. James LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API