Legal Opinion

St. Andrassy v. Mooney

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1933PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiffs have recovered judgments for injuries suffered in a collision between a taxicab in which they were riding and an automobile owned by the defendant Mooney and driven by a chauffeur in his employ. The defendant Mooney does not on this appeal question that the evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding that the collision occurred through the negligence of his chauffeur, but urges that the chauffeur was driving the automobile without his employer’s authority or permission.

Proof of ownership is sufficient to establish prima facie that a custodian operating the car is engaged in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Norris v. . KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Chaika v. VandenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Fluegel v. CoudertNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Social Services v. Philip De G.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Murdza v. ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Piwowarski v. CornwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Fleming v. PonzianiNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API